Footballers and the national anthem, some common sense.

The press, well okay The Daily Mail has worked itself up about over paid footballers not joining in the national anthem.

Footballer Kim Little and another Scottish player, Ifeoma Dieke, had stood silently before Great Britain women’s opening match on Wednesday

Welsh footballers Ryan Giggs and Craig Bellamy were both criticised for failing to sing at the first British men’s football match of the Olympics

Now one of the Jockinese sports folk chose not to sing and sulked about how there should be a Jockinese team - sorry your not independent yet - at the Olympics, I shall however leave that one and concern myself with the footballers. Thats real footballers not the pretend Jockinese ladies team.

There have been calls for them to be punished etc etc.

Look its quite simple, Mr Giggs and the other chap are footballers, dim witted creatures that are not known in the main for their intellect. Give a footballer a bar and they will drink it dry and then attempt to trash it and get into a fight with other customers.

Give them a hotel and they will spitroast a young lady all night with their mates, destroy the hotel room and said young lady will complain about how badly she was treated whilst selling her tale of woe to the tabloids. Indeed its been alledged that a certain player isn't that fussy and even old ladies will do, but I shall leave Wayne out of this.

Indeed they also possess great acting skills and should a moth pass within ten feet of them they fall to the ground cluching their leg and acting so well, one expects a nomination at the Oscars to be given. Then amazingly 2 minutes later they are up and running about again.

Another skill is there ability to go a running to their highly paid legal staff to get an injunction to cover up their alledged bedroom antics and other naughty deeds. 

When doing their job, if you can call kicking a bag of wind to kick about for 90 mins a job then they are fine. Sure not good enough to win world cups, or anything else of note but still.

In short they I firmly believe - excluding the porridge wog as I stated earlier who threw a sulk, hell maybe it was PMT? - that footballers do not in the main have the intellect to remember the words to the national anthem.

Maybe we could liven our anthem up, or dumb it down if you like into some naughty poem about a man from Kent and throw in a few sweary words and the problem will resolve itself.
 
But credit where its due at least they did not get caught pretending to sing along like John Redwood(inset). Who was caught mimeing along to the Welsh anthem.

Immigration needs sorting Dave

An open letter to David Cameron on immigration.
Now this subject has always been a rather sensitive one to deal with and yet its one area that this government – like the last one- has utterly failed to deal with. There are many points to this, which I will detail and also list where the government has gone wrong.

First off we have the huge backlog of migrants going back years, not including the countless "lost files" and ones given amnesty – those that the state nows about anyway – a huge number of dusty files that assorted departments are doing sod all with whilst hundreds of thousands of migrants- if not more - live free and easy and illegally (until the case is resolved and if they are granted permission) in the UK.

The backlog of cases piled up in rooms, we are told and its probably much higher, amounts to 276,000. Most of the migrants are here illegally and should have been sent home years ago. They include 150,000 foreign workers and students still in Britain even though they were refused extensions to their visas; 101,000 untraced ‘asylum seekers’ left over from when 450,000 ‘forgotten files’ were discovered in 2005; and 3,900 foreign offenders released by the courts to protect their human rights.

Meanwhile the Home Sec. seems more preoccupied in snooping on our e-mails and text messages than keeping us safe from known Moslem terrorists sitting in prisons or subject to control orders and deporting them from the UK. I would add here that if the Home Sec. wishes to know our thoughts on her abilities or rather the lack of, she need only ask the average man in the street who will happily update her.

 Next up we have illegal migration, a farce when even ministers have to admit before committees that they have no real idea on the numbers gaining entry to the UK, how many are posing as students, the number of fake collages used by them to gain admission to the UK or it would appear even what day it is!

Oh and that brings me onto the EU, there has been lots of tough sounding talk on controlling EU migration, stopping benefits going abroad and it is quite frankly utter bollocks. The UK has signed away border controls with regards EU migrants and even in the few areas where it has any control like with benefits, the total lack of action on the part of ministers is appalling.

We hear the argument that they are needed etc but we have over 2 million unemployed here in the UK who need jobs and need them NOW. Jobs for our people, not Polish migrants. Action needs to be taken now, not in ten years, or 20 when recovery might happen. Controlling our own borders as a non EU nation would be a good start.

It would also be advisable to deport the endless numbers of light fingered Roma who arrived like some Biblical shoplifting plague to claim benefits, produce endless babies and empty the shops of goods faster than pikey travellers can set up an illegal campsite.

Now then we come to aid abroad, a strange obcession with this government who seem to be hell bent on pouring billions away, whilst we still have a huge national debt that needs clearing. Thankfully the plan to pour even more billions of taxpayers money away by incrreasing aid to 0.7% of GDP was talked down by one MP.

Sadly I fear it will raise its ugly head like a Somali fiddling the benefits system for his 16 non existant wives and be granted more time so this PC lunacy can be passed.

Again when ministers have been questioned on aid abroad, they have had to admit that there is no oversight, no control over who gets the money and that it does little if any good. Indeed stories have hit the press of certain dictators buying private jets, gold plated AK47's and increasing their Swiss bank accounts with taxpayers money. Ministers have yet again been shown to be lacking in knowledge of whats going on or indeed like the Home Sec. even lacking the knowledge as to what day it is.

Quite why this government that talks of fiscal prudence wants to pour billions to support head chopping middle eastern lunatics and African dictators who wear necklaces of human skulls I don't know?

On the subject of waste, you Mr Cameron promised a bonfire of quangos and like your “cast iron” promise on an EU vote, that was a lie. One such quango is the Immigration Advisory Council that was led by former share dealer and car crashing MP Keith Best who infamously stated that migrants were better passport holders than us natives.

That is one bunch of non jobs that promote UK cultural genocide and agree with labours idea of uncontrolled immigration to enforce multiculturalism. A quango well in need of burning.

Finally I shall mention labour with this bit from a national paper:

The massive increase in immigration under Labour was a deliberate policy undertaken for “social” as well as economic reasons. This is the conclusion of a study by Migrationwatch of documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

In an article for the Evening Standard last October, Andrew Neather, a former speech writer for Blair, Straw and Blunkett in the early 2000s, revealed that mass immigration “didn't just happen: the deliberate policy of Ministers from late 2000 until at least February last year... was to open up the UK to mass migration".

He went on to describe a Government policy document which he had helped to write in 2000. He said that "drafts were handed out in summer 2000 only with extreme reluctance: there was paranoia about it reaching the media."

The paper was eventually surfaced as a purely technical product of the Research Department of the Home Office but earlier drafts that he saw "included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural."

Indeed Dave, the only real difference between your lot and labour, is that you as yet havent been caught calling Mrs Duffy a bigot but should that happen I would not be surprised.

Update - we have the first Olympic illegal migrant - who has claimed asylum and run a brilliant race. His prize is a council house, benefits for life. Soon he will bring over his family, the entire tribe, his aged mother and even his pet goat!

The 2012 Olympics in Soviet Britain.

Don't even think about showing any dissent during the Olympics.

Police have been handed 'Chinese-style' powers to enter private homes and seize political posters during the London 2012 Olympics.

Little-noticed measures passed by the Government will allow officers and Olympics officials to enter homes and shops near official venues to confiscate any protest material.

Breaking the rules could land offenders with a fine of up to £20,000.

Civil liberties groups compared the powers to those used by the Communist Chinese government to stop political protest during the 2008 Beijing Games.

Anita Coles, of Liberty, said: 'Powers of entry should be for fighting crime, not policing poster displays. Didn't we learn last time that the Olympics should not be about stifling free expression?'

 

The powers were introduced by the Olympics Act of 2006, passed by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, supposedly to preserve the monopoly of official advertisers on the London 2012 site.

They would allow advertising posters or hoardings placed in shop or home to be removed.
 

But the law has been drawn so widely that it also includes 'non-commercial material' - which could extend its reach to include legitimate campaign literature.

Shadow Home Secretary Chris Grayling said at the time: 'This is a Government who just doesn't understand civil liberties. They may claim these powers won't be used but the frank truth is no one will believe them.' However since then he has said, well nothing really.

Liberal Democrat spokesman Chris Huhne also said: 'This sort of police action runs the risk of using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. 'We should aim to show the Chinese that you can run a successful Olympics without cracking down on protestors and free speech.' Again he has since becoming part of government said, well nothing really against this law.

Scotland Yard at the time this came out denied it had any plans to use the powers.

Got that, the woodentops will not be using the powers.

Er, hang on what all this then?http://www.bworldonline.com/content.php?section=Sports&title=Brand-wars-gather-pace-on-streets-of-London&id=55659

Olympic organizers have enforced strict rules to protect official trademarks, deploying about 250 uniformed “brand police” on the streets of the capital to ensure businesses do not piggyback off the world’s biggest sporting event.
The rules are simple: no one outside a small band of official sponsors such as McDonalds or adidas is allowed to make a profit by creating an association with the Games.
It is not the rules themselves that have irked some Londoners but their stringent enforcement and phrases such as “absurd” and “police state” -- often used jokingly but with a shade of resentment -- frequently crop up in conversation.
“It’s mad. It just seems... that corporations are being looked after but not the people,” said Lewis Parrin, 22, who runs a stall selling jewelry and watches in London’s eastern district of Stratford where the main Olympic venues are located.
“It’s quite scary, really. It’s like a police state.”
Another vendor nearby, when asked about a display of Olympic mascots on his makeshift stall, choked on his sandwich and removed them hastily. “I am glad you reminded me,” he said.
London is buzzing with curious stories of those who have found themselves on the wrong side of the brand police such as a stall owner who was told off for displaying the London 2012 logo and a butcher in a town hosting sailing events who had to remove a sign showing the Olympic rings made from sausages.
On a quiet side-street within walking distance of the Olympic stadium where the Games open officially on Friday, a cafe called Olympic has had to paint over the letter “O” to comply with the rules.

Gosh did the authorities and the plod lie about using these powers? Guess so. Oh go on here is one more silly enforcment rule http://hackneycitizen.co.uk/2012/07/24/hackney-newsagents-bunting-olympic-brand-policing/comment-page-1/

A Stoke Newington newsagent was ordered  by Hackney Council to remove festive decorations from his shop on the day the Olympic Torch relay passed by.
Hamdy Shahein, a well-known community figure, had decorated his shop, Hamdy’s Newsagent, with balloons, banners and bunting for the occasion.
On Saturday morning, however, Mr Shahein was visited at his Stoke Newington High Road premises by enforcement officers from Hackney Council.
They questioned him as to whether the decorations were official Olympic merchandise, and then requested that he remove them.
Mr Shahein objected to what he saw as the  heavy-handed approach towards the offending items. “I was shocked because I was making an effort to do something nice for the community”, Mr Shahein explained.

But you think thats silly, then how about this http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jul/22/stewart-lee-olympic-games-twitter

 

Yes and all of this is happening under Cameron and the Lib Dems who howled about authoritarian New Labour.

 

Which brings me to the Zil lanes set up by Labour, more on them here:Zil Lanes"

More than 250 miles of road are to be reserved for VIPs during the London Olympics.
Up to 80,000 officials, sponsors, politicians and athletes will have congestion free lanes in London and at other venues. Ordinary motorists face fines if they stray on to the reserved routes, which include sections of the M25. Challenging the fines could lead to a penalty of up to £5,000.

What you need to understand is that Labour believe that you are scum, an inferior untermenchen in your own land.

Your only role is to pay for the state 2012 party and to keep quiet, yes you pay to put your car on the road(unless your a pikey) and yet you are now officially a 2nd class citizen.

You will however be expected to get the fuck out of the way of important politico's, and all the other assorted 1st class citizens, who will be put up (at your expense), driven to Olympic venues(you paid for through your taxes) on roads (you pay for) and that you are not allowed to use.

 

Any dissent will be crushed.

More lies from state funded fake charity Alcohol Concern

First off I shall make clear my title, Alcohol Concern are NOT a charity. They are a state funded group, a quango that recieves almost every penny from your taxes.

Their ultimate aim is quite simple, the complete banning of alchol in all its forms in the UK. I don't exaggerate that the puritans who run this organisation are quite willing to lie, distort facts and portray booze as a bigger problem than it is.

Indeed this organisation helped back the smoking ban that has crippled the UK pub trade, they know the working man wants a pint and a smoke and so that had to go, they are also happy at the effect it has had with thousands of pubs shutting their doors for good.

Now they are repeating the same old lies via social media:
http://www.thedrum.co.uk/news/2012/06/28/alcohol-concern-set-launch-social-media-campaign-public-zone-ahead-january-detox

Alcohol Concern, the national charity for alcohol misuse, has revealed that it will launch a ‘January detox’ campaign in November.
The campaign, created by Public Zone, will include support from celebrities, as it aims to raise awareness and funds by building on the rising January detox trend taken up by many after they have overindulged during the Christmas period.
Jonathan Simmons, Public Zone founder, said: “It’s really exciting to work with Alcohol Concern on a project that they are investing in so heavily. The strategy is our heartland: inherently social, has a great idea at its core and is easily activated at a low cost. There are some great names connected to the project, so we’ll be able to have a lot of fun with it and help raise a lot of money too.”
The campaign, which will be promoted by partners such as the Health Service, print and online media as well as its celebrity ambassadors, will also look to recruit those who haven’t done a January detox before.
Emily Robinson, Alcohol Concern’s director of campaigns, said: “This is a really exciting campaign for us. The support from the people we’ve already spoken with has been overwhelming. Public Zone will create a strategy to maximise social media and launch a campaign that can achieve real cut-through to help make a big difference to the lives of many people.”

The best difference would be for our tax money no longer to be used to fund Alcohol Concern.

Talking of lies is the oft used one by the quango Alcohol Concern who's made up figures state that alcohol is 75% more affordable today than it was in 1980. Wrong, even HM Govt has pointed out that it is more expensive in real terms not less.

In the real world, not the taxpayer funded public sector or fake charity industry that Don works in; alcohol is (on average) more expensive than it used to be -see here(link). According to the Office of National Statistics:

Between 1980 and 2008, the price of alcohol increased by 283.3%. After considering inflation (at 21.3%), alcohol prices increased by 19.3% over the period

Plus the argument of units comes up again, despite them being discredited and meaningless, fag packet stats with no basis in science.

I shall quote The Times which said the recommended weekly drinking limits of 21 units of alcohol for men and 14 for women, first introduced in 1987 and still in use today, had no firm scientific basis whatsoever. http://www.timesonline.co.uk

Maybe the press could do a story on how an unelected quango is attempting to dictate policy to elected politicians, how it is the new face of the old religious prohibitionist movement and how it gets almost all its cash from your money via central government.